Sunday, January 30, 2011

Beginning a Discussion of the Federal Deficit

The GAO came out with a report this week about the fiscal sustainability of the federal government. Seehttp://www.gao.gov/highlights/d11201sphigh.pdf for a summary of the report.

And the Peterson Foundation has put up some amusing ads regarding the deficit. Have you seen the guy running for office promising to spend, spend, spend and leave it for our kids to worry about? Classic. The Foundation's website is full of scary facts about the deficit: http://www.pgpf.org/Issues.aspx

And this article is interesting http://www.businessweek.com/investor/content/nov2010/pi2010115_719576.htm

A month ago, David Walker, the Ex-Comptroller General of the GAO came to Austin. I escorted him to his two speaking engagements. His talk focused on how unsustainable our current path is. He shocked the students and UT and agitated and depressed the CPAs at a government conference. Our deficit isn't good news. He wrote a book called Come Back America which is detailed and full of solutions to the deficit problem. David has left the Peterson Foundation... but he isn't finished fighting He is the star of the documentary called IOUSA at http://www.iousathemovie.com/ You can watch the shortened version of the movie by clicking that option at the bottom right hand corner.

It is all good to know as - today - the Republicans are making a bid deal about forbidding earmarks. Any of these sites and references will tell you that will only take care of a tiny drop in the huge deficit budget. Medicaid and Social Security are our real problems. And few, if any, politicians have the guts to take those two enormous federal obligations on.

Sunday, January 23, 2011

A Weight on our Shoulders

As a Texas CPA, I have to earn six hours of ethics education to maintain my license. My ethics instructor, David Holt, said during class that CPAs are the only profession that can save this country. Our ultimate responsibility is to the public while other professions view their ultimate customer their client – a.k.a. the one who pays them. We are Certified PUBLIC Accountants, after all.
My initial reaction to David’s statement was, “If we are the saviors of this country, we are all in for a world of hurt.” If auditors, who are CPAs , are holding the United States on our shoulders – forget it! We are as good as dead.
As a self-employed person, I have significant selfish and mercenary tendencies. These tendencies are some of my best business survival skills. But I am afraid we are facing a crisis in this country that can only be helped by considering how our choices affect the community as a whole instead of just our own family and business.
Why do I have such a dim view of the profession?
Well, I know myself! And I have worked with CPAs in all but a few states. I teach government auditing standards, the AICPA SASs, audit skills, etc. for continuing education credits. And I have come to know, through various comments and worried looks, that CPAs in public practice are primarily worried about getting sued. And if you are constantly worried about being sued, you won’t call a spade a spade; you won’t do what is right but instead do whatever it takes to cover yourself.
Here is the evidence that I have that CPAs are intensely worried about being sued:
· The Statements on Auditing Standards, promulgated by the AICPA, are written in some archaic legalize that doubles back and repeats itself in nuanced, confusing ways that can only be written under the influence of a lawyer
· A representative of the GAO, who works with the AICPA on a regular basis, jokingly complained at a national conference that she can’t meet with the AICPA without three of their lawyers present
· A CPA firm in Louisiana refused to follow the guidelines in the Yellow Book regarding developing the elements of a finding for clarity and completeness in their reports because they were counseled by a lawyer to be as vague as possible in audit reports
· PPC – a company that provides canned audit programs and checklists – is doing great business as CPAs refuse to think for themselves and lean on PPC to make sure they don’t get written up in a peer review
· Every time I teach the Risk Assessment Standards – every time – someone pipes up and says “But if we have to use our judgment on an audit – we might get sued.”
Most CPAs in my Yellow Book class look a little pale when I quote them the following phrases from the Yellow Book:
GAGAS 1.01 Auditing is essential to government accountability to the public.
GAGAS 2.07 A distinguishing mark of an auditor is acceptance of responsibility to serve the public interest.
As if our title Certified PUBLIC Accountant wasn’t enough, the GAO is reminding us of our ultimate responsibility as auditors is NOT to the person who is paying our invoice, but to the public!
Money? Did you mention money?
And on top of worries about getting sued, auditors are also worried about making money. And if you worry about making money, you aren’t going to be motivated to say what is so - to say what needs to be fixed - because you will anger the client. They might fire you and find another auditor who is either clueless or passive and unmotivated to stir things up.
Wow, these two forces – worries about getting sued and worries about getting fired – make auditors a pretty weak lot. And we are supposed to save this country?
Has anyone asked you where you were?
As I write, the details of the $50 billion dollar Ponzi scheme perpetrated by a Wall Street hedge fund manager are coming to light. Come to find out, that the SEC visited this guy twice and deemed his operation clean! What?
And what about Enron and WorldCom and the Department of Defense? The Department of Defense has NEVER been able to create an auditable financial statement.
What about all those banks with those weak loans or the mortgage companies that were processing them?
When I tell feisty folks what I do for a living, they ask me “Where were you? Why didn’t you guys catch this stuff?” If they really want to know the answer, we talk about how auditing works and I end up uncovering our dark audit secret – that audits have a very limited usefulness. I really don’t like saying that, at all. But you know it, and I know it.
Am I bugging ya’? Didn’t mean to bug ‘ya.
Bono croons “Am I bugging ‘ya? Didn’t mean to bug ‘ya?” at his concerts as he sings about serious world injustices. What a pretentious jerk, eh? Well, this little email is a plea to you – as Bono made to his listeners – to do something to stop the madness. I know I am insulting some of you who do your best to fight the good fight. But for the rest of us, please consider:
· Putting aside your worries about getting sued or getting fired and say what needs to be said
· Think of the big picture when working on your audits. Skip the minutia and think of what your client is involved in that is risky to the public and say something about it!
· Try to implement the intent of the auditing standards, the spirit, rather than just doing the minimum it takes to make a peer reviewer happy
· Teach new auditors what auditing means – why audits are important – and what their responsibilities are. Stop treating them like mushrooms and do your best to impart your hard earned wisdom to them.
· Accept the fact that we may be the only ones with knowledge of a particular situation that have any inclination to do something about it. The players in the process are not interested in changing or telling on themselves. We have to do it – and our role is very important.
And above all, remember, that we have a great weight on our shoulders. We have an ultimate responsibility to the public – to the taxpayers - not to let things get out of hand. We have the power to hold people accountable for their actions – and this is a significant role in the world.
GAGAS 1.02 The concept of accountability for use of public resources and government authority is key to our nation’s governing processes.
More power to you!

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Schools

My husband is studying to be a school teacher. Yes, my entire household will be dependant on the government - in every conceivable way. Am I nervous? Yes.

But enough about me. He shared this u-tube video with me that was slighly disturbing - and exciting at the same time:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcfrLYDm2U

He comes back from his certification seminars overwhelmed by what he is expected to pull off in the classroom. Learning has to be project based, because that is how people work now a days. He has to take into consideration 8 different learning styles - including naturalistic and musical... and ensure that the gifted and talented are challenged, while the learning disabled kids are mainstreamed and brought along with the group. Special needs must be catered to and the government will pay whatever it takes to help a disabled child perform - equipment, staff, whatever it takes.

He told me that his teacher - the teacher's teacher, if you will - said that parents don't get sued for being bad teachers - but they do get sued if they are not attentive to a needy child.

I had lunch with a gentleman who's daughter is a special needs teacher. She declined working at a tony school district because the high expectation parents band together and sue the principle, adminstrators, and teachers every year for whatever they can string together.

What is going on here? Is this all a good idea? I'm not sure. My teachers used to hit me with a ruler if I fell behind. They could have cared less if I finished. I don't even know why I did. I absolutely hated high school. But watching that video scares me and makes me think I am already a dinosaur. What about my kids? Are they going to be ready? Can we all get ready at the same time, or does bringing everyone with make for a mediocre trip?

And that gets me to thinking about drop out rates for large school districts in Texas where low-income students make up at least 80 percent of the enrollment have dropout/attrition rates of 50 percent or more. Source:http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/metropolitan/7063520.html

Our friend's intelligent son was so bored in high school that he dropped out. The school district approached him and offered him $1500 to finish the year. He took it. Small price to pay in order to preserve the thousands that the district gets if they can get him to show up every day and pass those tests. Although I can't find an article on this to back me up - I did find this discussion of the idea in Bostonhttp://www.boston.com/bostonglobe/editorial_opinion/oped/articles/2010/01/12/paying_kids_to_stay_in_school/

Vouchers anyone?

Wednesday, January 19, 2011

Benford's Law Analysis for Fraud Detection

I am working through Urton Anderson's fabuolously helpful book "Implementing the International Professional Practices Framework" and ran across a recommended preventative measure for fraud in chapter 9 - Benford Law's Analysis.

This rang a few vague bells - so I Googled the term and found this site that looks worth looking into. It includes a quick tutorial on how to analyze data for patterns to detect unusual or fraudulent transactions. See http://www.ezrstats.com/Benford.htm Is this vendor trustworthy? I don't know. What matters is the technique - and that the IIA thinks enough of it to expressly recommend it in its literature.

IIA Issues New Red Book (International Professional Practices Framework)

Yesterday, the Institute of Internal Auditors issued the new red book. And you can download Word and PDF versions of the document at this site:

http://www.theiia.org/guidance/standards-and-guidance/ippf/standards/

Take time to check out the document that indicates the edits that were made.

To get access to the Practice Advisories - which are the bulk of the red book - you have to be a member of the IIA or buy the book from their bookstore. The standards are short and have always been available to the public.

I am creating a course contrasting the yellow book and the red book for Sandia Labs over the next few days and will give you a heads up on what the big changes are soon. Yes, some shops are orange.